The New York Times on Mark Driscoll
At Reform & Revive, I try to offer only original content, but this was something I couldn’t pass up. A friend and fellow “Westminsterian”, Art Boulet, put a post up on his blog a few days ago containing an article about Mark Driscoll that appeared in the New York Times. I found both the article and the discussion that followed in the comments section fascinating.
Here’s Art’s blog and the article
The article gives a surprisingly fair assessment of the Reformed Theology and style of both Driscoll and those of us that find ourselves ascribing to Reformed doctrine while still in our twenties – the “New Calvinists” as they say. I also enjoyed the analysis of the current Evangelical culture that these “New Calvinists” are reacting against. I thought the article sort of brokedown though, and the author’s bias showed through, during the discussion of Dricoll’s views of Church government. It portrayed him as a sort of dictator wanting mindless followers in his congregation and eldership, while not tolerating dissent or criticism of any kind.
My dad taught me you can always tell a journalists’ ultimate bias or true opinion on a topic simply by reading the last sentence or paragraph of any article. This is certainly the case in this article, and its kind of blatant. Enjoy.



ts
Never mind the NYT. Here’s an article from the chuch’s hometown newspaper where Driscoll used to be a religion columnist:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004020898_webmarshill18m.html
Jan 17, 2009 @ 4:20 pm